Re: Configurable vs. reconfigurable

Subject: Re: Configurable vs. reconfigurable
From: iain -at- hairydog -dot- co -dot- uk (Iain Harrison)
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 10:34 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

> You can either configure something or you can't - doesn't matter how
> many times you can change parameters.

Sorry to be pedantic, but that isn't always true. There are situations
where you only get one chance to configure, or only a few chances. Once
you have chosen, you are stuck with it.

Having said that, I'd still use configurable rather than reconfigurable.

--

Iain

iain -at- hairydog -dot- co -dot- uk
iainh -at- cix -dot- co -dot- uk




Previous by Author: FW: Are you debating [...]
Next by Author: Re: British English technical variations
Previous by Thread: Re: Configurable vs. reconfigurable
Next by Thread: (Re)configurable?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads