Re: The Old Argument: FrameMaker vs. MS Word

Subject: Re: The Old Argument: FrameMaker vs. MS Word
From: edunn -at- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:39:54 -0500



>>And then there is the time factor. Good technical writers are hard to find.
>>If they spend 60% of their time on layout and production related jobs, you
>>need more than twice as many writers to complete a project.

If the FrameMaker template being used is set up properly, the DTP tasks
performed by the writers is limited to virtually nil. If your writers are using
FM 60% of the time for layout and production then, sorry to say it, but the
process is inadequate and the template designer is incompetent.

Eric Dunn






Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Watermarks & Graphics
Next by Author: Re: iff vs. if in documents
Previous by Thread: Re: The Old Argument: FrameMaker vs. MS Word
Next by Thread: Re: The Old Argument: FrameMaker vs. MS Word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads