RE: The Old Argument: FrameMaker vs. MS Word

Subject: RE: The Old Argument: FrameMaker vs. MS Word
From: Lane Pasut <Larissa -dot- Pasut -at- OmegaResearch -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:51:02 -0500

I agree, and contend that layout work extends beyond just visual appeal. The
design/layout impacts comprehension, so that's my domain. I see the ability
to layout/design a document as part and parcel of technical writing, a
definite plus in your portfolio of skills... but then again, I am also one
of those multi-taskers... my 2 cents thrown in.

Lane

-----Original Message-----
From: Giordano, Connie [mailto:Connie -dot- Giordano -at- FMR -dot- COM]

<snip>
I just don't get this point of view. I guess I'm not only not in my right
mind but also not a 'human being". I think there are a whole bunch of us
out here who happen to be outstanding writers, analysts, AND designers.






Previous by Author: ForeHelp KLink Problem
Next by Author: RE: Interviewing contract technical writers
Previous by Thread: RE: The Old Argument: FrameMaker vs. MS Word
Next by Thread: RE: The Old Argument: Framemaker vs. MS Word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads