TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
hrm ... i'm not a member of stc and its sigs, however I must raise issue
with some of the following comments.
>...comments such as these very
>upsetting, and derogatory.
are they derogatory, or just true and not particularly complimentary?
>Many members (not enough I can assure you)
>devote a lot of their time to producing newsletters, hosting web pages,
>planning seminars at conferences, contacting new members and making
>them feel welcome, submitting articles to the newsletter, and many other
>activities ALL FOR FREE!!
and I'm sure that's very fabulous on their part, but if I pay $x.xx to
receive advertised items, then I expect to receive them, period. I'm sure
that plenty of us here have given uncompensated time, in order to meet our
particular requirements, deadlines, etc. So now the
I-who-subscribes-to-a-SIG is now a client of the group of folks who have
committed their time, energy, and resources. I'd think that fulfillment of
stated deliverables would be expected.
>There are, however, costs involved in
>accomplishing these tasks. Do you also feel those vounteers should fund
>these out of their own pockets?
Again, I-who-subscribes-to-a-SIG was paid me fee, I-who-subscribes-to-a-SIG
expect the stated deliverables. Do you think your clients care about your
blood, sweat, and tears, when you don't make their deliverables?
>Have you ever got involved with a SIG to see just what it takes, in
>time and money, to run a successful SIG? I'm sure you would find it
>very enlightening; I sure did when I first became involved 3 years
As a client of the SIG, I-who-subscribes-to-a-SIG don't care what it takes
in time and money, until it involves *my* time and money. If
I-who-subscribes-to-a-SIG don't receive the expected bang for my buck,
>If you feel that you've not received fair value for your meager
>contribution to whatever SIGs you've belonged to in the past, have
>you voiced your concerns to the SIG Managers? I'm sure they would be
>interested in any suggestions you might have for making the SIG more
>valuable. I know I would appreciate such information regarding the
This topic I can't address, because I don't know how much information is
provided to a stc member who joins a SIG. And if an stc sig member does
complain, does the member get any sort of refund of the investment? Or do I
only get to complain, with only potential response or improvement?
>Maybe you would get more value out of a SIG if you vounteered to help
>in its operations.
Again, to put this into a client/vendor perspective,
I-who-subscribes-to-a-SIG has been automatically promised deliverables X, Y,
and Z, with my stated obligation being $x.xx amount. Those are the terms of
the contract. Is it stated in a SIG membership application, that
I-who-subscribes-to-a-SIG must supply not only the stated $ but also my own
time, energy, and resources, to receive my deliverables?
And yes, I'm quite well aware that voluntary, non-work-related, outside
involvements take time, energy, and money. I've been there myself. However,
I-who-subscribes-to-a-SIG should be able to expect whatever stated
deliverables the SIG membership states, or I should be made to understand
the additional requirements that will make my deliverables happen.