RE: Kovitz vs Traditional functional/design specs?

Subject: RE: Kovitz vs Traditional functional/design specs?
From: Christina R-Shull <Christina -dot- R -at- ttimail -dot- com>
To: Geoff Hart <Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 13:25:54 -0600

HI,

Now it makes more sense to me!

Thanks!

Christina

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Hart [SMTP:Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 1:17 PM
> To: 'Christina R-Shull'
> Subject: RE: Kovitz vs Traditional functional/design specs?
>
> Greets!
>
> In the original post, the author had the sequence right, so I didn't
> bother
> addressing that issue; he did suggest "figure out what first, then how
> next".
>
> --Geoff Hart, Pointe-Claire, Quebec
> geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca




Previous by Author: RE: Kovitz vs Traditional functional/design specs?
Next by Author: Quick survey
Previous by Thread: RE: Kovitz vs Traditional functional/design specs?
Next by Thread: Mac vs. Windows keys/buttons/etc. in two-platform documentation?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads