Re: Electronic grammar-checker

Subject: Re: Electronic grammar-checker
From: "TrishGreen" <TrishGreen -at- austin -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:05:50 -0600

I've found that Word's grammar checker is good for "passive voice" errors.
The rest... well, at least it's customizable.

Trish Green
Malachite Finch Publications, Ltd.

----- Original Message -----
From: Jean Weber <jean -at- wrevenge -dot- com -dot- au>

<snipped>
I don't consider any of them worth wasting time on. Word's is handy for
finding some types of errors, but only if you can recognize which errors
are real ones.

Regards, Jean
Jean Hollis Weber






Previous by Author: Re: MIME format
Next by Author: Re: Time keeping
Previous by Thread: Re: Electronic grammar-checker
Next by Thread: Technical Writer Job Opening


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads