Re: W2 vs 1099 and what's really important (was: Pay rate for contrac tor with no experience)

Subject: Re: W2 vs 1099 and what's really important (was: Pay rate for contrac tor with no experience)
From: Justin Cascio <justin-paul -dot- geo -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:03:47 -0500

Thanks to everyone who's answered me recently, online and off, about
both the contracting issue and that *# -at- $ Word numbering issue. I think
I'm going to start charging more an hour for contracts w/o bennies, and
go back to hand-numbering in Word.

And Andrew, as always, I loved your top ten list. You crack me up.

Justin

--
Justin Cascio: Technical Communication http://move.to/techwriter

"Ol' Diz knows the king's English. And not only that, I also know the
queen is English."
--Dizzy Dean, baseball great, responding on air to a letter from a
listener who said he didn't know the King's English






References:
RE: W2 vs 1099 and what's really important (was: Pay rate for co ntrac tor with no experience): From: jack_vanwye

Previous by Author: Re: W2 vs 1099 and what's really important (was: Pay rate for contrac tor with no experience)
Next by Author: Re: Software to keep track of Multiple versions
Previous by Thread: RE: W2 vs 1099 and what's really important (was: Pay rate for co ntrac tor with no experience)
Next by Thread: Basic Info on Network Security??


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads