Re: techwr-l digest: February 17, 2000

Subject: Re: techwr-l digest: February 17, 2000
From: "Nancy E. Kaminski" <nancykam -at- mediaone -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <TECHWR-L -at- LISTS -dot- RAYCOMM -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:49:12 -0600

From: George F. Hayhoe <george -at- ghayhoe -dot- com>
> I've been using ATM since its first release for Windows 3.0 and have
> never had any problems with it whatsoever. Nor have I ever heard of
> anyone else having problems with it.

Thank you, George, and the many other people who answered my question. It
does seem that some people have experienced problems, but most respondents,
like George, reported none.

My little department had our meeting yesterday and, when they listed the
fonts they routinely used, I discovered that my coworkers did occasionally
use Type 1 fonts. They just didn't know they did. I think the tipoff was
when one of them said, "I like ACaslon and Frutiger." <g>

Obviously not all of us have this "geek computer user" thing mastered.

Thanks for your feedback,
Nancy K

===============================================
Nancy E. Kaminski , Technical Writer/Editor
Fairview Health Services, Minneapolis, MN USA
(612) 672-6882 phone, (612) 672-6083 fax
nkamins1 -at- fairview -dot- org | nancykam -at- mediaone -dot- net
"Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so." -- Douglas Adams
===============================================






Previous by Author: Problems with ATM?
Next by Author: Re: OT: How would you pronounce this word...?
Previous by Thread: RE: techwr-l digest: February 17, 2000
Next by Thread: Re: techwr-l digest: February 17, 2000


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads