TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: tech word for user interface From:"Giordano, Connie" <Connie -dot- Giordano -at- FMR -dot- COM> To:"'Carnall, Jane'" <Jane -dot- Carnall -at- compaq -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:33:06 -0500
I have never heard of this terminology for user documentation, although
others might have. If this is a web-based application, you might consider
using some sort of site map, with the appropriate terminology, to help users
navigate to these parts of the system. If not web-based, most users I've
dealt with more easily understand terms such as "module" to indicate
interfaces grouped by functionality. I agree, the current terminology
probably won't migrate to end users easily.
From: Carnall, Jane [mailto:Jane -dot- Carnall -at- compaq -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 9:22 AM
Subject: tech word for user interface
The SME's for a new product have come up with terminology to describe
various interfaces within the product, based on the positioning of the
interfaces in a diagram (similiar interfaces are grouped together in the
The interfaces at the top are called "northbound", those at the bottom are
called "southbound", and to left and right "eastbound" and "westbound".
Is this a standard way of identifying interfaces? I haven't come across it
before, and it's not particularly common on the Internet: where it is used,
it appears to be mainly Java and CORBA technical documents, not user
Should this terminology migrate to user documentation? I don't find it
particularly intuitive, and it makes it easy to identify the interfaces only
if you are looking at the diagram on which it is based.
Technical Writer, Compaq, UK
Unless stated otherwise, these opinions are mine, and mine alone.