TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: MS Word Master Document From:"@í" <sdeichmann -at- voicemobility -dot- com> To:techwr-l Date:Wed, 15 Mar 2000 09:07:47 -0800
I have had lots of problems in the past with Word's master document feature,
and abandoned it about 4 years ago. I have not used it in Word 97 or Word
2000, so I cannot comment on whether MS has improved it.
I have worked with 250+ page documents in Word 97 and Word 2000 with much
success. The graphics were even embedded in the document, not linked. I
recommend converting it to a single doc.
Andriene Ferguson <Andriene -dot- Ferguson -at- concisetech -dot- com> wrote in message news:40127 -at- techwr-l -dot- -dot- -dot-
> I have a 300 page manual to update. The manual was created in MS Word as a
> Master doc. I am trying to decide whether to keep it as a master doc or to
> convert it to one word doc. I know Word does not handle large documents
> well, but if I link all the graphics I think it should be okay. I have
> worked with Word's master doc feature, but I have heard horrible things
> about it.