TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: MS Word Master Document From:"David M. Brown" <dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 15 Mar 2000 19:39:32 -0800
David Chisma wrote:
> The big advantage using Master doc (or Include fields) is that the
> sub-documents could be edited independently of the main document. If the
> main document is big, Word is slow and falls over easily.
Note that using RD fields yields the same benefits (smaller doc files that can be edited independently, multiple-file TOC and index).
More important (to me, anyway) is that we're being forced to use the Master Document "feature" to create PDFs. According to a session leader at the recent WinWriters convention, Acrobat "handles" multiple-file documents assembled with the Master Document feature, but not those assembled using RD fields.
Can anyone confirm or (preferably) refute this?
Does anyone want to share any tips in creating PDFs from Word 2000?
David M. Brown - Brown Inc.
dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com