TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
<"...Pagemaker or Framemaker...? Here are the factors.
1. The majority of our grads will work in small businesses creating shorter
manuals, brochures, newsletters, etc.
2. It is a one semester class so will not go into advanced features.
3. We already have Pagemaker in our labs.>>
For the situation you describe, stick with PageMaker. Frame is very very
cool, but not for marketing stuff or brochures.
On the other hand, in a past life I was in charge of creating tons and tons
of pages very structured pages with dense tables of electrical
specifications. I suffered through PageMaker for that project--looking back,
Frame would've been a much better option. You might want to have some
discussion with your students about the kinds of issues that might make one
better than the other--tables would be one of those issues, IMHO.
You might also see if you can get a trial version of Frame, so that at least
the students can see how it works.