RE: Worthless Tech Comm Degrees

Subject: RE: Worthless Tech Comm Degrees
From: Melanie Shook <mshook -at- com2001 -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:02:38 -0600

Andrew Plato wrote:
<snip>I've been watching this idiotic debate about FrameMaker - and it never
ceases
to amaze me how many people just don't get it: Nobody cares what tools were
used if the document SUCKS!!! ...Hours and hours of pointless debates about
FrameMaker - and never a moment spent talking about ACTUAL topics you may
one day document.</snip>

True - but if the appropriate tool can save you time and anguish, use it.
It has very little to do with the layout and design of the document, other
than the very general "brochure" vs. "book" vs. "letter."

Personally, I'd use a nailgun instead of a hammer.

Melanie Shook
Technical Writer
COM2001.com
(405) 419-7032
mshook -at- com2001 -dot- com





Previous by Author: RE: Framemaker vs. Pagemaker - a tongue-in-cheek suggestion
Next by Author: Index (WAS What sayest me... on Worthless TC Degrees)
Previous by Thread: RE: Worthless Tech Comm Degrees
Next by Thread: RE: Worthless Tech Comm Degrees


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads