TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Worthless Tech Comm Degrees From:Kari G Andres <kandres -at- UDel -dot- Edu> To:Andrew Plato <intrepid_es -at- yahoo -dot- com> Date:Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:04:17 -0500 (EST)
well, i'm sorry-- i can't avoid this. i don't think anybody has said that
what goes into the document is irrelevant. in fact, a number of threads
have discussed how what the person's particular background has given them
the ability to digest technical information and then be able to write
about it. i don't care what tool you use, how you present the info-- if
it is not technically correct, or understandable to your user, it is
useless garbage. i think everybody agrees with that. what everybody
doesn't agree with is how to go about producing the document. in my
particular case, an engr degree is how i went about it. my cert in tech
writing taught me audience analysis and design. both of these are
invaluable. what i could care less about is frame vs word vs pm.
personally, i have never used frame-- don't think i ever will. i do use
pm, and i am going to be using quark because that is what my new job uses.
i got the job because of my background and my writing style, and my
ability to understand and digest a wide variety of subject matter and be
able to present it to an audience of choice. i did not get the job
because of the tool i use.