RE: Structure: Was...What sayest me...

Subject: RE: Structure: Was...What sayest me...
From: "David Chinell" <dchinell -at- msn -dot- com>
To: "'Tim Altom'" <taltom -at- simplywritten -dot- com>, "'TECHWR-L'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:29:03 -0500

Tim:

How would you suggest defining document structure
for documents that will never be cast in XML or
SGML?

Bear

=====

Maybe we're talking past one another, but
structure for us is of vital
importance, no matter what we're writing. We think
of EVERY doc as being in
SGML/XML, with a tree structure that must be
maintained. Any other way of
doing it is "artistic" or "river rafting" to us,
writing that just plunks
down whatever, wherever.

=====






Previous by Author: Studies on bolding
Next by Author: FW: Word picture question
Previous by Thread: Structure: Was...What sayest me...
Next by Thread: Re: Structure: Was...What sayest me...


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads