TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Master/slave/mirror: an interim tangent From:Eric Ray <ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com> To:"Mark L. Levinson" <markl -at- gilian -dot- com> Date:Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:02:12 -0600
> And maybe, though I will go through with it and summarize,
> I asked the wrong question. The answers I'm receiving
> are convincing me that the phenomenon I need to
> describe might be seen less as a case of control than as
> a case of mirroring. Likely I could avoid the term "slave"
> by using the term "mirror." But what is the name of the
> original object that a mirror mirrors? Is there an accepted
> term for that? Altavista does not give me a lot of hits for
A mirror (in disk usage terminology) is simply a mirror.
E.g., a mirror for the TECHWR-L Web site consists of
two disks, each with a complete copy of all data.
(If you have two identical copies of your data, it really
doesn't matter which is primary and which is secondary. )
If you're describing a RAID level 1 system, this is the
If you have a primary drive that is then copied to a duplicate,
you might use sub-mirror to describe the duplicate.
Yell offline if you need more information--I'm currently working
on some disk management software documentation.