TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Maybe We Need a New Job Title - Summary From:"Giordano, Connie" <Connie -dot- Giordano -at- FMR -dot- COM> To:"'Dianne Blake'" <write-it -at- home -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:00:08 -0400
I know that Information Designer and Information Architect are frequently
listed on job sites such as Monster.com, so somebody must be taking them
seriously :)
Connie Giordano
-----Original Message-----
From: Dianne Blake [mailto:write-it -at- home -dot- com]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 1:54 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Maybe We Need a New Job Title - Summary
Dear Friends,
Thank you for all your input. I've received several good suggestions
for new job titles that might more accurately describe what a technical
writer does. These are serious titles that IMHO might be worth fighting
for during job negotiations:
* Documentation Manager
* Executive Communications Officer
* Information Analyst
* Information Architect
* Information Designer
* Information Developer
* Manager of Information Design and Delivery
* Technical Analyst
* Technical Communications Specialist
Do you think that companies find these titles more worthy of higher pay
than a technical writer? Or are you thinking that titles like don't
mean anything and are like calling a trash man a "sanitation
specialist"?
