TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Word 2k question From:Dianne Blake <write-it -at- home -dot- com> To:Techwriter <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 02 May 2000 12:18:01 -0700
scott -at- soffront -dot- com wrote:
> I don't think there are any improvements. To me, the functionality is
> the same in W2K than previous editions (e.g., Word 97).
You are right as far as long documents go, but Word has added these
* It has improved web editing support
* Better support for international users
* Collect and Paste (allows more clipboards to paste items to)
* Table formatting (including diagonal lines)
* Click and Type (similar to WP, but harder to turn off and on)
* You can now switch between documents using the task bar instead
of having to go to the Windows menu (WP has had this for a while)
* Themes feature for changing the entire look for a web or other
IMHO, just the task bar switching for documents is worth the upgrade.