TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Framemaker vs. Quark From:"S" <kittenbreath -at- hotbot -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com Date:Wed, 10 May 2000 12:23:44 -0700
Thank you to everyone who has taken the time to write about the Framemaker vs. Quark issue.
Your responses have been helpful and informative, and I'll be using them in my meeting with my boss later. I really want to stay with Framemaker, and it is clear marketing has not thought through the conversion. But then again, they are not known for thinking things through before acting.
I noticed mentions of generating TOCs in Framemaker. I wasn't familiar with this feature! How do you do it??
I'll let you all know the decision--your info has been great and I feel much more informed now. Keep it coming if you can think of more pros or cons.
