Re: Help! Framemaker vs. Quark

Subject: Re: Help! Framemaker vs. Quark
From: John Fulton <John -dot- Fulton -at- enterprisemodeller -dot- com>
To: "'Techwr-L'" <TECHWR-L -at- LISTS -dot- RAYCOMM -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 14:37:26 +0100

On Fri, 12 May 2000 14:59:19 +0200, addforlist -at- hotmail -dot- com ("Christopher")
wrote:

>IMVHO (and I'm a newbie :), any printer should accept postscript, and any
>'with it' printer is ready or getting ready for accept PDF. Perhaps I've
>over-dosed on Adobe propaganda, but PDF is great for sending to the
printers
>(isn't it?)...

PDF is wonderful for sending to printers who use Docutech machines - in
fact,
the printers I've dealt with recently have been adamant that PDF is the best

format for them to receive files. PDF files are typically much smaller than
postscript, so the printers can store them on their server for longer, so
you
can call off short print runs when you need them, thus reducing your
inventory.

Now, colour printing is another matter, and something I have no experience
of, but for high speed, black and white, Docutech printing, PDF is great.

John Fulton
--
Business Integration Technologies Ltd.
Stoke Bruerne
Northampton
Email: john -dot- fulton -at- enterprisemodeller -dot- com
http://www.enterprisemodeller.com






Previous by Author: Differentiate the product (was Take this engineer and shove it)
Next by Author: Re: them engineers
Previous by Thread: Re: Help! Framemaker vs. Quark
Next by Thread: RE: Help! Framemaker vs. Quark


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads