TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Barry replies, yea, I'll take a stab at it Johnny. When I was working at a
different company there was this woman who was a pretty good writer, but she
did not have any background in technical writing. She decided she wanted to
take a whack at technical writing, but the powers-that-be wanted her to take
some classes.
There is this college here in Portland, Portland Community College, where
you can get a writing certificate. In her case she only needed to take 4
10-week classes (12-credits), and all of them were offered online, and I
think she took all of them concurrently.
The result was that after 10-weeks - bam! She was a Technical Writer I.
The Point? Not everybody who takes a certificate class goes into the class
with zero knowledge. Some people take the certificate to prove what they
already know.
P.S. She proved to be a valuable asset to the company as a technical writer.
Regards,
Barry Kieffer
Senior Technical Writer
ADC Telecommunications
Portland, OR
503.350.6072
barry_kieffer -at- adc -dot- com
Johnny Brown wrote: <snip>
Well the concencus so far is these schools do not produce competent writers
and that the people who are churned out after 4-6 weeks are being
ripped-off.
Is there anyone out there who can defend their use? </snip>
