RE: Interesting XML discussion from TechWr-L [long]

Subject: RE: Interesting XML discussion from TechWr-L [long]
From: "Brierley, Sean" <Sean -at- Quodata -dot- Com>
To: "'melonie -dot- mcmichael -at- amd -dot- com'" <melonie -dot- mcmichael -at- amd -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 09:42:05 -0400

Why are you looking to transfer your docs to XML?

Why the fast-track to do it inside a year?

I don't think low-cost XML publishing software is here yet . . . feels to be
three years out. Thoughts?

Sean
sean -at- quodata -dot- com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: melonie -dot- mcmichael -at- amd -dot- com [SMTP:melonie -dot- mcmichael -at- amd -dot- com]
>
> We are considering transferring our docs to XML within the next year.
> So, if FM+SGML is not a viable option RIGHT NOW (I don't bet on a
> software companies promises), what other options are out there?
> Are any of you working with them? Likes and dislikes?
>
> I checked out ArborText, it looks great but it would be VERY expensive
> to implement company wide. However, it might be our best option.
>
> Thanks for the input!!
>
> Melonie (Lonie) McMichael
> Tech Doc Coordinator
> AMD-CPD
> mailto:melonie -dot- mcmichael -at- amd -dot- com




Previous by Author: RE: GUI vs Hand, Was: estimating the cost of building a web si te
Next by Author: RE: Interesting XML discussion from TechWr-L [long]
Previous by Thread: Re: Interesting XML discussion from TechWr-L [long]
Next by Thread: RE: Interesting XML discussion from TechWr-L [long]


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads