TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
While I agree with you in principle, that that is how things should happen,
I have seen enough of corporate bungling to know that decisions like who
they keep and who they let go are rarely based on sound logical, rational
|Thanks for condescending... not too many people on this list will do so,
|and I've recently felt a lack.
|Your "prediction" is based on exactly what, that happened in the past?
|Has there been some wholesale purge of tech. writers I haven't noticed in
|15 years in the industry?
|I do recall that, around a decade ago, there was a general series of
|"company downsizing" that resulted in both talented and untalented people
|being on the street. The talented got new jobs, and the untalented
|changed careers, I'd assume, or waited until the next shortage of writers
|and hopped in again.
|Your "anecdotal evidence" that people with majors in English are somehow
|the first ones up against the wall when the revolution comes lacks any
|citations (can you provide some?) and smacks of misguided elitism. Your
|privilege, of course, but in the end, this will be true:
|Good writers will keep their jobs, or get new ones quickly. Bad writers
|That's always the situation when layoffs hit, and it is likely to
|continue that way. Any attempts to describe which educational background
|constitutes the "good writers" should be backed up in facts.
|Have a superior day,