Re: Objects that share a fate

Subject: Re: Objects that share a fate
From: Glen Warner <gdwarner -at- ricochet -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 04:58:13 -0700

Janice Gelb <janiceg -at- marvin -dot- eng -dot- sun -dot- com> wrote:

> If this occurs so seldom, do you really need to
> invent vocabulary for it? How about just saying
> something like "Deleting the A object also deletes
> its dependent B objects."

There you are, Mark -- "Object" and "Dependents." If you use that,
give Janice a tip o' the hat for coming up with it.

> *****************************************************************
> Janice Gelb | The only connection Sun has with
> janice -dot- gelb -at- eng -dot- sun -dot- com | this message is the return address.

"Sigs? We don't need no stinkin' sigs."

Previous by Author: Re: Fw: Should I Start Sending Out My Resume?
Next by Author: RE: Client from Hell redux
Previous by Thread: Re: Objects that share a fate
Next by Thread: RE: Objects that share a fate

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads