TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: RoboHelp vs. ForeHelp From:Tom Huffman <tlhuffman -at- earthlink -dot- net> Date:Wed, 7 Jun 2000 16:43:04 -0400
Both are good tools. RoboHelp has somewhat more power (easy insertion or
pre-defined DHTML effects, RH 2000 WinHelp that gives a tri-pane view similar to
HTML Help, Glossary and Favorites tabs in HTML Help, transparent access to HTML
source, and a boodle of useful accessories), but ForeHelp is cheaper, a smaller
installation, and somewhat more flexible (imports FrameMaker MIF files and
allows for considerable customization of of the cross-platform WebHelp
I'm not sure either is a good choice for single-sourcing. Though both will
generate manuals, it's just the same content formatted in a linear,
print-appropriate fashion. I'm not a fan of single-sourcing, though. Help files
and manuals are just too different to make single-sourcing wise, IMO. Tools like
Quadralay WebWorks (FrameMaker) and Doc-To-Help (Word) are better for
single-sourcing, but neither are as powerful, flexible, or as easy to use purely
as HATs as either RoboHelp or ForeHelp. So, it's a trade-off.
If you are committed to single-sourcing, you should get a tool especially
designed for that purpose. If you are primarily interested in a HAT tool or are
not committed to single-sourcing, then either RoboHelp or ForeHelp would be a
> I am new to this group and want to thank you for allowing me to participate.
> Our company is currently developing a new piece of software and have decided
> to embrace a new help authoring tool. This tool must allow us to maintain a
> help file and written documentation with the same content. In the past we
> have used HelpBreeze and have found it difficult to use. We are now looking
> at RoboHelp and ForeHelp. I have heard good things about both of these
> products which is making it difficult to make a decision. Any comments or
> suggestions would be appreciated.
> Thanks for your help.
> Tony Adler
> Product Specifier
> Digital Monitoring Products
> 2841 E. Industrial Drive
> Springfield, MO 65802
> tadler -at- dmpnet -dot- com