Re: Structure vs Substance?

Subject: Re: Structure vs Substance?
From: Andrew Plato <intrepid_es -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: Dan Emory <danemory -at- primenet -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 22:16:33 -0700 (PDT)

--- Dan Emory <danemory -at- primenet -dot- com> wrote:
> The essence of Economics is statistical analysis. There is none in Kelley's
> article. If Kelley presented his article to a roomful of real economists,
> he'd be laughed out of the building.

When did you last take an econ class? Economics is WAY more than stats. In
fact, stats are an insignificant portion of econ. Most of it is theory mixed
with business case study.

Okay, here's a new mag for you, Dan. Try the Economist. A magazine FOR
economists. They have QUOTED Kevin Kelley. They also did a fantastic article
about Alan Greenspan and the frictionless economy about 3 months ago. In this
they discuss many of the same concepts Kelley does.

Scan their website: and you'll find it.

The Economist is a significant forum for discussion of the New Economy. They
are also big supporters of frictionless, open commerce.

> Kelley's article was written in 1997. Already some of his premises are
> proving to be as squishy as the factual basis for his conclusions. It
> is laughable that anyone's world view would be materially altered by
> reading his article.

Which premises exactly, Dan? Please elaborate.

The New Economy isn't some evil force out to deprive you of standards. Reject
it if you want. However, many of the high-tech industry titans are beginning to
implement business models and teams based on New Economy concepts.

Just a thought.

Andrew Plato

It's Mulder's baby:

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!

Previous by Author: Re: Structure vs Substance?
Next by Author: Re: Structure vs Substance?
Previous by Thread: Re: Structure vs Substance?
Next by Thread: Re: Structure vs Substance?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads