Re: Structure vs Substance?

Subject: Re: Structure vs Substance?
From: Michele Davis <mdavis -at- bitstream -dot- net>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 15:41:46 -0500

Anybody have to take Dif EQ in college! Ha! Dismal is right.


just another stop on the web:

Dan Emory wrote:

> Statistics is the fundamental underpinning of Economics, and it is only that
> underpinning that qualifies it to be classified as a science.
> Hence its other name--the "Dismal Science,"
> where the dismal part is the statistics.

Previous by Author: Re: Structure vs. Substance?
Next by Author: Government structures
Previous by Thread: Re: Structure vs Substance?
Next by Thread: Re: Structure vs Substance?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads