Re: Structure vs. Substance?

Subject: Re: Structure vs. Substance?
From: Tracy Boyington <tracy_boyington -at- okvotech -dot- org>
To: Stephen Arrants <sarrants -at- roidirect -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 16:56:11 -0500

> No Tracy, this is metacontent, not true content. Data or a description about
> content, not content itself.

But still not completely devoid of content -- you cannot describe content unless
you have at least an idea of what the content will be.

> And the folks arguing that structure isn't all that necessary aren't
> seeing that the structure is almost second nature, wired somewhere in their
> brains.

Well, I agree. But I also think those who are arguing the opposite are doing the
same thing.

Tracy Boyington mailto:tracy_boyington -at- okvotech -dot- org
Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education
Stillwater, Oklahoma

RE: Structure vs. Substance?: From: Stephen Arrants

Previous by Author: Re: Structure vs. Substance?
Next by Author: Re: Structure vs. Substance?
Previous by Thread: RE: Structure vs. Substance?
Next by Thread: Re: Structure vs. Substance?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads