TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Structure vs. Substance? From:"Jason A. Czekalski" <topsidefarm -at- mva -dot- net> To:TECHWR-L digest <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 13 Jun 2000 19:43:54 -0700
From: Mike Stockman <stockman -at- jagunet -dot- com> wrote:
<< As I said before, on any project, get the information and content
and then we can talk about having fun with processes. >>
Mike, I think you have this backwards. I have to agree with Stephen
MacDonald on this one. In my experience, when good prcesses were in
place, information seems to flow to the appropriate places at the
appropriate times. SME's don't have to spoon feed me, and I don't waste
time chasing them.
Yes, there are times when processes fail. But more often than not, it
was not the process that failed, it's a case of someone didn't follow