Re: professional memberships? Was: TW screening qy's

Subject: Re: professional memberships? Was: TW screening qy's
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com>
To: techwr-l digest recipients <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 18:12:19 -0700

Susan Brown wrote:

>- Do they follow the advancements, discussions, etc. etc. in our profession?
>(Membership in TECHWR-L, STC, ACM SIGDOC all count for a check mark in the
>pro column.)

Suggested grading:

Not very experienced - belong to them all, and waste most of my
waking hours on them.

Experienced - belong to them all, but don't waste time being
actively involved, only money

Very Experienced - quit them all, and am now extremely productive
because of all the time I save.


Bruce Byfield, Outlaw Communications
Contributing Editor, Maximum Linux
bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com | Tel: 604.421.7189

"Prodigy is, in its essence, adaptability and persistent,
positive obsession.
Without persistence, what remains is an enthusiasm of the moment.
adaptability, what remains may be channeled into destructive
Without positive obsession, there is nothing at all."
- Octavia E. Butler, "Parable of the Talents"

Previous by Author: Re: movie ad
Next by Author: Fwd: Help in Planning
Previous by Thread: professional memberships? Was: TW screening qy's
Next by Thread: Directory Index - How to edit Description?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads