TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Star Office From:"Peter G. Martin" <peter -at- access -dot- com -dot- au> To:Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com> Date:Mon, 03 Jul 2000 11:28:22 +1000
At 08:34 PM 7/1/00 -0700, Bruce Byfield wrote:
> Mark Dempsey <dempseys3 -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
>>I'm wondering whether anyone's been using Sun's Star
>>Office (old or recent release), particularly as their
>>word processor. Areas of concern:
>>1. Reliability with longer docs.
>>2. Use in collaborative work
>>3. Compatibility with others using Word..
>As you may know, StarOffice imitates MS Word fairly closely. On
>the one hand, its header and footer system is less cumbersome,
>but, on the other hand, it also buries style definitions far down
>in the menus.
>I have heard (but not personally confirmed) that it is only
>slightly better than MS Word with longer documents. I don't
>believe that it has any features that make it useful for
>collaborative work, but, if you're using it under Linux, you
>could easily use it with CSV or another versioning system.
>As might be expected, StarOffice's compatibility with Word isn't
>perfect. However, I have to say that its translation filters are
>better than almost any I've seen. If you're doing fairlly
>uncomplex documents, you shouldn't have much trouble, but you
>should also remember that the perfect filter simply doesn't
To add one interesting (for me) perspective to this, a number of
us have seen situations where StarOffice succeeds in reading legacy
documents written by an earlier version of Word where the "up-to-date"
Word crashed out and couldn't handle them.
Like the man says, "the perfect filter simply doesn't exist..."
Hardly a day passes when I am not grateful for formats like FrameMaker
MIF, where you can generally rely on the compatibility downwards, or at
least can do something about it if something goes wrong.
--peter -at- access -dot- com -dot- au -- Peter G. Martin, Tech writer
mobile: 04 08 249 113 Home: peterm -at- zeta -dot- org -dot- au
Home page: http://www.zeta.org.au/~peterm
"Regexes::Text as Numbers::Mathematics."