RE: Future of FrameMaker: InDesign? [Long]

Subject: RE: Future of FrameMaker: InDesign? [Long]
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com>
To: techwr-l digest recipients <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 09:18:15 -0700

"Brierley, Sean" <Sean -at- Quodata -dot- Com> wrote:

1) For small to medium-sized companies, XML-based authoring tools
are too
expensive and are still out of reach at the enterprise level.

Both DocBook and jade are free.

Also, you can't just look at the cost of the software. You need
to look at the time saved. If you're single-sourcing, then an XML
solution would pay for itself with time saved after 2 or 3
projects.

--
Bruce Byfield, Outlaw Communications
Contributing Editor, Maximum Linux
bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com | Tel: 604.421.7189

"Their armament is being right (seeing right, doing right),
The armament of Righteousness is going to save the world."
- OysterBand, "The Generals Are Born Again"




Previous by Author: Re: 1099 -- What to ask?
Next by Author: "Consultants" and "Freelancers" (was: Re: 1099 -- What to ask?)
Previous by Thread: RE: Future of FrameMaker: InDesign? [Long]
Next by Thread: Need information on Corel Draw and PDF plus transition to Marketing


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads