Re: "Bug" reporting for documentation?

Subject: Re: "Bug" reporting for documentation?
From: Elizabeth Ross <beth -at- vcubed -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:37:01 -0400

DING! DING! DING!
You win!

<s>
--
Elizabeth Ross
Senior Technical Writer, V3 Semiconductor Corp.
beth -at- vcubed -dot- com http://www.vcubed.com
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum.


> From: "Dawson McKnight" <dawson_mcknight -at- hotmail -dot- com>
>
> Is it possible that the difference lies in working on new documentation vs.
> maintaining existing documentation? It sounds like a few of the
> bug-reporting advocates are using bug reporting for doc maintenance tasks
> rather than refining fresh prose. Right now, I'm working on draft docs that
> have never been read before. Perhaps bug-reporting would work better after
> the document is finalized and in the field (?).





Previous by Author: RE: The Perfect Productivity Metric
Next by Author: Re: Immigration to Canada
Previous by Thread: RE: "Bug" reporting for documentation?
Next by Thread: "Bug" reporting for documentation?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads