TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I'm having problems posting to the list (domain name changes within the
company) so you didn't see my response . One company I worked for called it
the V&V dept. (Validation and Verification). QA (or QA/QC) was only used
for finished (released) products to test and confirm they were made to spec
and could be sold to a customer. The V&V department tested beta
software/hardware to confirm they met the project specs. Even if they
passed the V&V dept testing you could not send it to a customer because it
was not a released product. Because this company was a medical equipment
company, there were strict rules about development that had to be adhered
to, to meet FDA regulations for accountability.
On Friday, July 14, 2000 8:08 PM, kanerb -at- concentric -dot- net
[SMTP:kanerb -at- concentric -dot- net] wrote:
> OK, since no one else has said it (unless I missed something) -- I'll
> this to the list.
> At one of the greatest places I ever worked (Artisoft), it was called the
> Test Engineering department.
> I thought that was much more descriptive than QA. What these guys do is
> software. I think Quality Assurance is a sorry buzz-phrase that smacks of
> false promises.
> Hasn't anyone else worked someplace where they called it Test
> Surely we weren't unique.
> Beth Kane
> Senior Communications Specialist
> PersonalGenie Inc., Tucson group
> KaneRB -at- concentric -dot- net