RE: Making Word documents dead-only?

Subject: RE: Making Word documents dead-only?
From: Mike Stockman <stockman -at- jagunet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:35:54 -0400

On 7/24/00 11:30 AM, Tom Johnson (johnsont -at- starcutter -dot- com) wrote:

>About the best you can do is make it as hard as possible to edit.

I disagree. If you're concerned about the document being hacked and
edited, "about the best you can do" would be to digitally sign it, as PGP
and other products might do, with a lengthy checksum. That way, anyone
who wants to can hack and edit however they want, but only your
unmodified original will satisfy the digital signature.

Why go to great lengths to do something that can be cracked anyway
(obscuring the document at 72 dpi, making it read-only, etc.) when you
can easily make your original the only "real" version? Life's too short
to worry about who's changing your text. Prevent bad consequences, and
move on.

----->Mike

_______________________________________________________________________
Internet: stockman -at- jagunet -dot- com AOL: MStockman
AOL Instant Messenger: MStockman






Previous by Author: Re: This list mirrors real life
Next by Author: Re: Reference info from Internet in Bibliography
Previous by Thread: RE: Making Word documents dead-only?
Next by Thread: Image captions in WebHelp


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads