RE: "not technical enough"

Subject: RE: "not technical enough"
From: "Maggie Secara" <maggiros -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: cres -at- cres -dot- com, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 02:02:15 PDT

I don't want to sound defensive, but there is a bit or two between the research and the publishing. It's not as if you could just pour the SME's notes into a format and call it documentation--assuming the SME was inclined to write out the notes to begin with. I've never been in a situation where all I was expected to do was "publish it." Guess I've been lucky.

Maggie Secara
~Tell me the ingredients, I'll serve it forth. The cook? Just a glorified scullery maid. (I'll take my glory now, thank you.)

.

From: Crescent Enterprise <cres -at- cres -dot- com>

<snip>

In some cases, you have systems engineers in a company who do all the
subject matter research and tech writers really only have to publish it.

<snip>
Steve Whitney

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com





Previous by Author: Re: Word 97 problems
Next by Author: Re: Printing from Word using DocuTech systems
Previous by Thread: Re: "not technical enough"
Next by Thread: FW: "not technical enough"


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads