TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Basically, it's the record companies who own the copyright to songs, making
musicians more like technical writers than creative writers, who at least
retain the copyright to their work. This situation is heinous IMHO.
If Napster raises our awareness on this issue, then Napster has performed a
Senior Technical Writer, V3 Semiconductor Corp.
beth -at- vcubed -dot- com http://www.vcubed.com
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum.
> From: "Humbird, LenX" <lenx -dot- humbird -at- intel -dot- com>
> Reply-To: "Humbird, LenX" <lenx -dot- humbird -at- intel -dot- com>
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:32:00 -0700
> To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
> Subject: RE: OT: Music
> But beyond that tired debate, there is a much bigger story to this than
> simply RIAA suing Napster because they're encouraging illegal copying of
> copyrighted materials by the general public. It's whether or not Napster and
> other businesses like this are engaging in illegal activity, and more
> importantly, if this operation is protected under the constitutional 1st
> amendment regarding freedom of speech. I believe they are. Besides, IF RIAA
> could show a recent and significant drop in overall sales, what is the
> likelihood of them proving that it was due to Napster? I don't think they
> What's really the point is how the recording industry (and Hollywood) is
> operating, and where the money is flowing. On this issue, I tend to agree
> with the wackos in that the concept of "albums" is a convenient bundling a
> bunch of crap with one or two good songs and charging a premium for it.
> Nevermind how many tech writers they employ.