Re: Get to the point?

Subject: Re: Get to the point?
From: Annamaria Profit <inteltek -at- erols -dot- com>
To: Peter <pnewman1 -at- home -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2000 14:06:33 -0400

Personally,

I prefer the journalistic, approach:
Topline/the Point
Critical info
Nice to know info
Detailed explanation
Filler

I scan the TOC, the exec summary, and the first paragraph of any
relevant chapter, then go to the index for specific info if I need it.

> Bruce Byfield wrote:
>
> > Getting to the point is a good idea in any modern writing. Modern
> > readers don't have the patience to endure (for example), a three
> > page introduction that starts with a man walking down a road, the
> > way that a couple of Thomas Hardy's books do. Personally, I like
> > a leisurely pace, at least in some moods, but it just doesn't
> > play for many readers today.

--

Annamaria Profit
E-mail: inteltek -at- erols -dot- com
URL: http://www.erols.com/inteltek

**************************************************
Celebrate failure! It's a critical element of learning.
**************************************************




Previous by Author: MS OFFICE documents: embedded bugs
Next by Author: Re: Tracking the Effectiveness of Ads
Previous by Thread: RE: Get to the point?
Next by Thread: Re: Get to the point?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads