Re: Font size for headings (was:Font size)

Subject: Re: Font size for headings (was:Font size)
From: Dick Margulis <margulis -at- fiam -dot- net>
To: Michael West <mwest -at- oz -dot- quest -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 22:17:38 -0400

Michael West wrote:
> You can find a clear division of focus among contemporary graphic
> and typographic designers on either side of a fault line that has
> "visual stimulation" on one side, and "meaningful content" on the
> other. Edward Tufte, Jan White, and some others I know about
> stand clearly on the "meaning" side, and those are the ones we as
> technical communicators should be paying attention to.
> --

Naturally, I agree that technical communications should stay on the
"meaning" side, Michael. And the fault line you speak of is real. But it
is not new and I don't think that all designers fall on one side or the
other. The division between typography designed to grab the reader's
attention (ads, newpaper headlines, magazines) and typography designed
to convey text quietly has been around at least since the 18th c., maybe
longer. And some people certainly spend their working lives on one or
the other side of the division. But many famous and not-so-famous
designers have successfully worked both sides, as well.



Previous by Author: Re: Font size
Next by Author: Re: Font size
Previous by Thread: RE: Font size for headings (was:Font size)
Next by Thread: Re: Font size for headings (was:Font size)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads