TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>Does anyone else use 9pt? Anyone use smaller? My personal taste is that
>body text in 11pt or bigger reads like the books you find in the library
>people with not so good eyesight. I read a lot of novels and am comfortable
>small typefaces. I was just wondering why we persist in using 11pt, 12pt
>larger, for our documents when most people are comfortable reading the
small type of
>newspapers and books.
Well, first, I'm afraid (and embarrassed that) I have to ask an ignorant
question. What does 'leading' mean?
You're absolutely correct that people typically read fonts much smaller than
12 pt. When it comes to manuals, however, I prefer the text to be large
enough to be comfortable under less-than-ideal circumstances. In other
words, I picture myself looking up something at the end of the day when I'm
tired and frustrated and my eyes hurt from staring at my computer screen all
day. What would I prefer to see? I'd rather have the font be a bit larger,
with a bit more white space than typically found in a novel or a newspaper,
to make it easier for me to find and read what I'm looking for.
Also, for non-native English speakers, smaller type may be harder to read.
I know myself I find smaller Hebrew fonts much harder to read than larger
ones (Hebrew not being my native language, but the language of the country
where I live).
My 2 cents,
Eshbel Technologies, Ltd.
sharon -at- eshbel -dot- com