RE: Framemaker vs. w/SGML

Subject: RE: Framemaker vs. w/SGML
From: "Brierley, Sean" <Sean -at- Quodata -dot- Com>
To: "'techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 11:57:33 -0400


SGML brings forced, rigid structure to your documents, plus the potential
for an easier path to structured XML down the road. However, if you are
coming from a PageMaker environment, I'm not sure you'll use that level of

Best regards,

sean -at- quodata -dot- com

-----Original Message-----
From: David Berg [SMTP:dberg -at- dmpnet -dot- com]
Being the newbie TW that I am, I have a question for the Framemaker
out there.

My company currently uses Pagemaker (and occasionally Word 97) for
documentation. My boss is considering buying Framemaker next year,
and I
would like to have some information to help me decide whether to
make a
pitch for Framemaker w/SGML. What are the basic practical reasons
for paying
the extra price for SGML?


Previous by Author: RE: desktop or laptop?
Next by Author: RE: .chm to hlp?
Previous by Thread: Framemaker vs. w/SGML
Next by Thread: When "Just do it" doesn't work

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads