RE: FU word implication

Subject: RE: FU word implication
From: salatas <salatas -at- micron -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 08:05:21 -0600

Michele Davis wrote:

> I've gotten two sides:
>
> 1) Someone who stays at home, works PT or FT at a job non-related to
> household duties, and is available for the children.
>
> 2) Someone who stays at home and only does house-related duties and
> takes care of the children.

To which Mark Webb responded:

#1 defines a "working mom". Whether working at home or somewhere else is
irrelevant. Normally, it involves the exchange of money.
#2 is a "stay-at-home" mom, (significantly) busy with her home and family,
not
directly involved with bringing home the bacon (normally money).

To which I respond:

#1 defines any worker who works from home and happens to have children
around. It could be a working dad, sibling, or grandparent as well. If you
change the word "children" to "family members," it could also apply to all
of those who work at home and take care of any family member who needs
assistance.

My question would be not whether where someone works is relevant, but how
one's family status is relevant to where one works.

Salette Latas
salatas -at- micron -dot- com




Previous by Author: RE: The world's most frequently read instructions
Next by Author: RE: Collaborative Efforts
Previous by Thread: Re: FU word implication
Next by Thread: RE: FU word implication


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads