Re: a vocabulary question

Subject: Re: a vocabulary question
From: "John Gilger" <bjgilger -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "Mark Levinson" <MarkL -at- gilian -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 04:54:16 +0100

The programmers are right. If you are going to document software, especially
for programmers or related users, you have to use their language. Actually,
no matter what you document, you have to do it in the audience's terms.

I am creating software specifications and user documents for a product
requestedby and designed for the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction
(AEC) community. Some meeting get quite interesting, since many of the
metaphors used by software engineers come from the construction industry.
You may be surprised how many definitions "specification" or "spec" has.

We write our software requirements using the software engineers' metaphors
and the user docs using the architects' definitions. As long as we meet with
each group separately, the communication works ok.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Levinson" <MarkL -at- gilian -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 1:48 PM
Subject: a vocabulary question

> I said no, the dependency is the condition or relationship.
> It's the depending. It's not the thing that's depended on.
> In fact, if it's either thing at all, it's the thing that
> depends on the other, as Guam is a dependency of the USA.
> They said, well not in our world, because when we compile a
> program we have something called a Dependencies List and it is
> a list of what the program depends on.

Previous by Author: RE: OT RE: Curling, was Delaying burn out?
Next by Author: Re: Document Management Systems
Previous by Thread: RE: a vocabulary question
Next by Thread: Re: a vocabulary question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads