TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:FM 6.0 vs word 2000 benefits From:Jason Allen <jasnallen -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 28 Sep 2000 06:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
I posted this yesterday and haven't seen it hit the list. It is
something I need quite quickly so please excuse this "duplicate" post
if it comes through twice.
I've just signed on to the list and have a question. First though, I
have looked at the archives. There must be a ton or two of info
regarding these two applications and their earlier versions. However,
that is not going to get me to the place I need to go.
I have an opportunity to convince my VP that we should change from Word
2000 (on a pc) to FrameMaker 6.0. I can give him reasons but they are
not specific enough. He's looking for $/time saved, etc. in addition to
all the rest.
My question is what are the positive and negative points for these two
versions (the reasons I understand and the bottom line stuff he needs)?
I'm not interested in the reasons for older versions since things
change with each new release. Also, I don't want to start a war of any
kind. I just need the facts and I need them quickly.
Thanks in advance for any and all help.
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free! http://photos.yahoo.com/