TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Choices other than Word From:"Metzger, Lucinda" <cmetzger -at- dukane -dot- com> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 12:27:30 -0500
"Quark Express, Adobe InDesign, and Corel Ventura are page layout programs,
mainly used for magazine production, etc., although some tech writers do a
bang-up job creating technical docs using them...Quark, Ventura, and
are generally not considered the best choice for writing tech docs. They
on graphics intensive, single-page layouts. Maintaining multiple text flows
creating TOC's and indexes would be a manual procedure in these programs."
Emphatically, NO, NO, NO!!!
Ventura is *NOT* in the same category as Quark and InDesign in the ways you
describe. It was expressly designed for doing long technical documents. Its
ability to handle complex documents with multiple chapters, lots of
graphics, tons of cross references, etc. is still its greatest strength.
Ventura easily handles multiple text flows, and has auto TOC and indexing
That said, Ventura can also handle short, graphics-intensive documents with
ease. I don't use it to create 4-color glossies because that's not part of
my job, but I know people who do.
Dan, I'm not jumping on you personally, but I could not let those inaccurate
statements go without comment. Ventura has some foibles (many of which can
be fixed) but it is still an excellent program, and has many fiercely loyal
users. It should be more widely marketed than it has been for the last few
years -- shame on Corel for dropping the ball there. If more people knew the
types of things you can do with Ventura and realized that it is still a
contender in the DTP arena, maybe we Ventura users wouldn't be such a