TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Publish or upload- correct use of terminology?
Subject:RE: Publish or upload- correct use of terminology? From:Tom Murrell <trmurrell -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
I feel a need to weigh in on this one. (Sorry, I tried laying down, but
the urge didn't go away. <g>
--- Mike Adams <Mike_Adams -at- summithq -dot- com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to disagree on that one. "Publish" is just a dumbing done
> performed by M$ when they thought up Frontpage. The term is upload.
> When you upload file to a website, they have also "done more" that
> simply change location. If you have properly uploaded the files to
> the proper location, they will change the website.
> From: John Posada [mailto:jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com]
>
> Publish infers more than moving the file from one place (C:\) to
> another (http://). In fact, much authoring software, when it comes
> time to move the web site online, uses publish also.
>
> When you upload the files, nothing is changed, just the location. In
> the case of an ecommerce web site, publish is more appropriate.
Perhaps I go back too far in the computer business, but I DO see a
distinction between 'publish' and 'upload' that builds on what John
Posada was talking about.
If I upload a program but don't activate it or otherwise make it
generally available, I haven't published it. I have merely changed its
location.
To me, publish implies that it is made available to others for use or
is generally accessible. Uploading doesn't necessarily do that, though
I readily admit that common usage might not make this distinction.
Perhaps an analogy will clarify. I can upload an html page, but if I
don't link it to the site, say through the main page, then it isn't
accessible to others (unless they get lucky typing random page names
into their browsers, I suppose.) But if I DO link it, then it is much
more likely that others will find it. Therefore uploading has merely
placed the page in a new place, whereas linking it to an index or other
page a user might be expected to browse to will allow the user to find
it. It would therefore be published.
