RE: FrameMaker releases (was FrameMaker vs Ventura) and PDF Mark

Subject: RE: FrameMaker releases (was FrameMaker vs Ventura) and PDF Mark
From: Dan Emory <danemory -at- primenet -dot- com>
To: "Brierley, Sean" <Sean -at- Quodata -dot- Com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 10:40:08 -0700

At 12:48 PM 10/3/00 -0400, Brierley, Sean wrote:

Hallo:

------------------------Snip

WWP SE is not a dud, it's an export filter for HTML and XML. If you need to
create online help, then WWP SE is the wrong tool.
================================================
WWP SE comes with a couple of built-in templates. If, as is likely, those templates
don't fit your needs, WWP SE is worthless. You must buy WWP Pro to
produce customized templates. Admittedly, one WWP PRO license
could be used to create custom templates that are then available
to users who have WWP SE, but that's not an ideal solution.

In my opinion Omni System's MIF2GO is not only much cheaper than
WWP Pro, it's also better. Not only that, but Omni Systems provides
unlimited free tech support.
====================
| Nullius in Verba |
====================
Dan Emory, Dan Emory & Associates
FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing
Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory -at- primenet -dot- com
10044 Adams Ave. #208, Huntington Beach, CA 92646
---Subscribe to the "Free Framers" list by sending a message to
majordomo -at- omsys -dot- com with "subscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.






Previous by Author: Re: FWD: Anonymous tip about Frame futures
Next by Author: Re: FrameMaker and Databases
Previous by Thread: Re: Subject: Re: Does anyone still use WordPerfect?
Next by Thread: RE: FrameMaker releases (was FrameMaker vs Ventura) and PDF Mark


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads