RE: accuracy in packaging

Subject: RE: accuracy in packaging
From: Sanjay Srikonda <SSrikonda -at- invlink -dot- com>
To: 'Emru Townsend' <etownsen -at- Softimage -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:39:51 -0400

um, has anyone read a container (box) of toothpicks and the instructions
"Insert flat end in mouth and use"

I'm very glad they pointed this out to me, until I chose to read the
instructions I kept sticking the things into my eye, now well, the mystery
is all cleared up.

Of course, nothing gets to me more than "New and Improved" which always
leads me to the question was the previous version "Old and Crappy"?

-----Original Message-----
From: Emru Townsend [mailto:etownsen -at- Softimage -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:27 PM
Subject: RE: accuracy in packaging


You'll find that on any chocolate or peanut-based confection now -- even
cans of peanuts. It's overkill, but then there's no underestimating
stupidity, is there?

Previous by Author: RE: Top ten myths of technical communication
Next by Author: RE: What do we call this button?
Previous by Thread: RE: accuracy in packaging
Next by Thread: Re: accuracy in packaging

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads