Re: Are we just secretaries?

Subject: Re: Are we just secretaries?
From: "Jane Bergen" <jane -dot- bergen -at- usa -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:19:37 -0500

Hi, Anna,

You started a lively discussion, but regarding your message (echoed
below): What's a "good point"??? If you don't include at least a portion
of the message to which you are responding in YOUR message, it makes no
sense. Same with a previous message where you say "Look who..." --- no one
can tell who or what you're talking about.

Not being crabby, just want to remind EVERYone that responses ought to
include at least a snippet of the original message.

Jane Bergen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mariposa BY" <mariposa625 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: Are we just secretaries?

> Good point
> Thanks!
> Anna

Learn how to develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver!
Dec. 7-8, 2000, Orlando, FL -- $100 discount for STC members. or 800-646-9989.

Your web site localized into 32 languages? Maybe not now, but sooner than
you think. Download ForeignExchange's FREE paper, "3 steps to successful
translation management" at

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: usage
Next by Author: Word 97 vs 2000 (was Re: What's the best software)
Previous by Thread: Re: Are we just secretaries?
Next by Thread: RE: Are we just secretaries?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads