Re: Are we just secretaries?

Subject: Re: Are we just secretaries?
From: Lisa Wright <liwright -at- qwest -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:07:57 -0600

All right, hold it. You had no problem at all shredding me for raising
the exact same question in a private post where you weren't concerned
about what everybody else thought.

This from m w yesterday:
>Typical. Just like a woman to refuse to defend
>another woman.

>Why is it always a competition between women? And
>then you have the nerve to blame men for all your
>problems. Such hypocrisy.

You are the one who made the association between clerk=woman in the
first place. Maybe instead of treating women (in public, anyway) as a
group of things to be treated in a certain way, you should try _treating
us like individuals_.

And you're quite right. I don't need someone like _you_ standing up for
me. I don't particularly like the things you stand for.

Lisa Wright

Learn how to develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver!
Dec. 7-8, 2000, Orlando, FL -- $100 discount for STC members. or 800-646-9989.

Your web site localized into 32 languages? Maybe not now, but sooner than
you think. Download ForeignExchange's FREE paper, "3 steps to successful
translation management" at

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: Are we just secretaries?
Next by Author: Packaging options for small CD runs
Previous by Thread: Re: Are we just secretaries?
Next by Thread: Re: Are we just secretaries?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads